<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fivevs1.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/u/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fivevs1.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/u/</link>
	<description>Every. Single. Pearl Jam. Song.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:08:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oleyever</title>
		<link>http://fivevs1.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/u/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>oleyever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fivevs1.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/u/#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>I like how the lyrics are actually the opposite of what i first thought they were.  First of all, the title and poppy sound and first couple of listens and you might think it&#039;s a &quot;I love you because you&#039;re you&quot; message, but it&#039;s not.  It reminds me of the famous &quot;it&#039;s not you it&#039;s me...&quot; break up excuse (invented by George Costanza, apparently)...but Ed&#039;s never been one to gloss over the truth...it&#039;s not me, it&#039;s U. I can almost picture this as a Madonna dance-club song, all remixed and electronicked up.  Imagine an Ed Vedder, Madonna duet...I think U is as close as we&#039;ll ever get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like how the lyrics are actually the opposite of what i first thought they were.  First of all, the title and poppy sound and first couple of listens and you might think it&#8217;s a &#8220;I love you because you&#8217;re you&#8221; message, but it&#8217;s not.  It reminds me of the famous &#8220;it&#8217;s not you it&#8217;s me&#8230;&#8221; break up excuse (invented by George Costanza, apparently)&#8230;but Ed&#8217;s never been one to gloss over the truth&#8230;it&#8217;s not me, it&#8217;s U. I can almost picture this as a Madonna dance-club song, all remixed and electronicked up.  Imagine an Ed Vedder, Madonna duet&#8230;I think U is as close as we&#8217;ll ever get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
